Thus, I understand and, at least to a degree, concur with the sentiment but believe it to be overblown. in his work that simply fall short comparatively and come off almost like phoned in efforts well beneath genuine Macca.
As I touched on I really don't think such songs are as common, both in terms of frequency, or being as silly/cheesy/cliche/lightweight as people suggest they are and they are often more humorous, tongue-in-cheek and/or musical references/homages than they seem and yet there are still tunes or lines, etc. "silly love songs" I must, alternately, and at least up to a point, agree with the general sentiment. Prefaced by the obvious fact ("You're subscribed to this sub, duh!") that I have an ineffable love for Paul and our three other boys and kneel at the sacred altar of the Beatles, as well as the additional fact that I often like and sometimes even love many such Paul compositions people commonly deem thus, i.e.
The directness and attempt to confront the subject has potential and mostly I agree with the message he means to convey but instead of feeling convinced lyrically and musically I just think something along the lines of "hmm, that actually was in fact not a very inspired/interesting composition musically and despite the probably purposeful, meta references intended seemingly as a winking reference to the sentiments and lyrics in such accused songs they themselves aren't actually interesting enough to be effective as a reference to the title or truly evoke much about love and/or adequately defend/represent his work of that sort. I liked the exercise anyway as made clear by the novel below.as for the actual song (with it first made clear that my love of Paul and the Beatles is boundless.I must agree here that the could've conveyed the same (largely true) sentiment more creatively and not, to me, undermining his effort to get his point scross in what's really a rather counterproductive manner. Edit: sorta misread and wrote tons about all such Paul songs and not just the literal song/several typos.
0 kommentar(er)
